Solution for “CPS Legal Child Trafficking”
In order to avoid confusion we are explaining this issue a little further:
We have been looking around on the issue of family, found a pdf on the issue in Florida. Keep in mind that this is a front because the person is not defined as a family or a member of a family- http://www.ncsl.org/documents/lsss/tue_haskins_handout2.pdf
So the first thing a lawyer will say is that the state recognizes families under family law of the state, however the person standing before the court is not recognized as being a part of a family in accordance with the definition of a person and therefore the family law would be null and void meaning that the state cannot see or recognize a family because the person is not defined as a family. The person has to be defined by the state as a family in addition to the other terms in order for the state to recognize the term family.
The conflict in definition is the conflict of law. There is no way to connect family law statutes to the person and therefore the person is not recognized as being a part of a family so the state is not seen as breaking up families and no war crime is established. It is slick how they did it which means it was deliberate.
In other words, if the person were further defined as a family along with the other terms in the definition, there would be a chain of title to the family statutes and the person would be connected to those statutes and would be eligible for the benefits of those statutes, however since the term person is not defined as a family, there is no chain of title to connect the term person to the term family, therefore the person standing before the court is not recognized as a family and therefore the family statutes would not apply.
Even in the term natural person, there is no reference to the term family, therefore if the person before the court is a natural person or an artificial person, there still would not be any chain of title to the family statutes because the term does not exist nor is there any connection between the natural person nor the artificial person to the particular term “family” statute. This would mean that the family court is without jurisdiction to hear any case that involves the term natural person or artificial person.
Resident Declaration: https://generalpostoffice.international/?page_id=660
If you have done a resident declaration, there is no need to do another one.
Social Compact Agreement: https://theunitedstatesofamerica1781.com/dot/bilateral-social-compact-agreement/
Tough Mothers Against Child Trafficking Group Link: https://generalpostoffice.org/nanp/
Silver Infusion: http://reignoftheheavenshealingcenter.com/shop/?wpam_id=2
Plasma Energy: https://plasmaenergysolution.com/?wpam_id=33
The Genoa Institute: https://genoaholdings.net/